Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Draper vs Tuki Jacobs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Draper vs Jacobs analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Draper vs Tuki Jacobs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Draper 1 - 0 Jacobs
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draper has won 50.4% of points on their second serve, while Jacobs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draper, in recent form, has won 50.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jacobs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.51% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draper has saved 58.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jacobs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draper has won 67.21% of matches played (W/L 41/ 20), with Jacobs winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 23/ 18). Jacobs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 16/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 18/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 20/ 8), where as Jacobs has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Draper winning 1 times and Jacobs being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Draper winning 2 and Jacobs winning 0. The last match between Draper and Jacobs was at the Nigeria F4 (Lagos), 03-10-2018, First, Hard with Jack Draper getting the victory 7-5 2-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draper and Jacobs have played a deciding set 0 times, with Draper winning 0 times and Jacobs 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Draper winning 0, and Jacobs 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draper has played against opponents with an average rank of 151.97 while Jacobs has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draper has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jacobs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draper has converted 43.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jacobs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
40
Rank
35
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
69% (207-94)
Career Total W/L
55% (34-28)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,580,085
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jack Draper vs Tuki Jacobs For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Draper VS Jacobs
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jack Draper | Tuki Jacobs |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 9 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 2-0 ret. | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Draper | Tuki Jacobs |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (47/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (427/374) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.63 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 247 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 91 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 98.03 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1398/2390) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (1088/1398) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (500/992) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (94/217) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (933/2510) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 74% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 53% (8/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Matteo Berrettini
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
12
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
47 of
54)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
55 of
66)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
20 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
26 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Frances Tiafoe
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
82 of
118)
31
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
53 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
60 of
82)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Marcos Giron
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Sebastian Ofner
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
8
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
41 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jack Draper
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Borna Coric
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tuki Jacobs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mehluli Don Ayanda Sibanda
Player
Tuki Jacobs
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuki Jacobs
Player
Andrea Bessire
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
13
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tuki Jacobs
Player
Courtney John Lock
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
123)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
56 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sadio Doumbia
Player
Tuki Jacobs
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
51
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tuki Jacobs
Player
Dominik Palan
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Tuki Jacobs
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gilbert Klier Junior
Player
Tuki Jacobs
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Sonkin
Player
Tuki Jacobs
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tuki Jacobs
Player
Florent Diep
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Tuki Jacobs
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Draper Vs Jacobs Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Draper are available here and Jacobs photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jack Draper
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
